Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Plan another evaluation to test your live trivia app using the think-aloud protocol with at least six people. With your prototype you tested the general game concept, but with this evaluation you want to ensure the game is fully usable and engaging. You also want to evaluate the quality of the trivia questions. Follow up this evaluation with a post interview of participants to get feedback on the overall effectiveness of your solution in addressing your chosen health issue. You want to learn as much as you can while using people's time wisely and respectfully.
Thinking Aloud from Nielsen Norman Group.
❏ Deliverable A document or slide that summarizes the results of your evaluation.
After confirmation of the solution’s quality, launch and promote the work. Monitor the use of your solution and gather direct feedback from key stakeholders for minor improvements or document recommendations for further development. Now is the time to refine all the details, review the process your team used to develop your app, and plan how you will tell your story to others.
Task
Estimated Time
Evaluation and Post Interview
3 hours
Question Analysis
2 hours
App Refinements
4 hour
Poster
3 hour
Prepare for Poster Review and Demonstration
1 hour
Public Presentation Plan and Practice
2 hours
Individual Reflection
1 hour
Present to Public
1 hour
Celebrate
1 hour
It is important to determine how you can get the most return (improvements in the trivia game) from the time you have remaining to work. So, based on your evaluation findings and question analysis, determine a plan to implement improvements while frequently testing to ensure nothing is unintentionally broken. Similar to your code requirements document earlier, simply list items by priority--high priority changes and low priority changes.
❏ Deliverable A document or slide listing improvements by priority.
✓- Below Standard
✓ At Standard
✓+ Above Standard
The application was functional but lacked completeness in presentation or did not meet the criteria set out in the challenge.
The application demonstrated a solutions that was thoughtfully crafted and met all the initial criteria.
The application was clearly the result of exceptional work that provided a highly engaging experience.
Plan and practice your team's approach to do the following.
Explain the function and value of your team's solution.
Summarize major points in your team's process with the project. Sharing the value of each activity leading up to the solution. (Be honest about what went well or didn't.)
Explain individual contributions and roles in the project, and a reflection of what you learned about collaborating on a team.
Share your individual perspective on potential careers and how they relate to computing, and include specific pathways you are investigating, like other courses, certification, college, or internships.
Your poster design is important for two reasons. One, it is an opportunity for your team to reflect on the project process and what you have learned, and two, it provides a great visual aid for explaining your work to visitors at the final event. Highlight at least six artifacts that demonstrate key work your team completed in the project process from beginning to end, and include a refined value statement that pulls it all together.
You can use this Google Drawing template which is set to 36 inches wide by 24 inches tall. Zoom in or out as needed to add text, images, etc. – but do not change the canvas size. (Be sure you're logged in to your Google Account. From the File menu, select Make a copy. Save the copied file to your shared team folder in Google Drive.)
If you use a different drawing/illustration tool, set the canvas size to 36 inches wide by 24 inches tall at 300 pixels per inch (10800 pixels wide by 7200 pixels tall).
If your teacher has specified a different size for the poster, use that instead.
❏ Deliverable A PDF file of poster (36" x 24").
The poster template below is only an example to inspire you on how text and images could be inserted for each element. You want to make your own poster design, but make it coherent and easy to follow. Also, your version may not have as many artifacts or sections as this.
✓- Below Standard
✓ At Standard
✓+ Above Standard
The poster has been created but it lacks a coherent explanation of what the team accomplished and the path they took in the project.
The poster includes fundamental artifacts of what the team accomplished along with appropriate explanations or annotations. The layout was coherent and helps the team tell the story of what they have done. The colors and fonts were chosen with an appropriate size and contrast for easy viewing.
The poster is exceptionally organized and offers a clear and concise overview of what the team accomplished. The style of the poster is very engaging and clearly reflects the the theme of the final product.
Share your trivia game link with classmates and others outside of class to generate some data on player performance. Prepare summary data and charts on people's responses to your trivia questions and draw some conclusions about the quality of the questions or people's general knowledge about each item. Look for any patterns indicating errors in your trivia questions and answers.
❏ Deliverable A document or slide that summarizes analysis in charts.
This is a time to develop a clear narrative to share about your team's work and enjoy sharing it with others in class.
❏ Deliverable Prepare a slide set with your poster, evaluation summary, and app link for discussion and demonstration your trivia app.
✓- Below Standard
✓ At Standard
✓+ Above Standard
The application was functional but lacked completeness in presentation or did not meet the criteria set out in the challenge.
The application demonstrated a solutions that was thoughtfully crafted and met all the initial criteria.
The application was clearly the result of exceptional work that provided a highly engaging experience.
Take the time to review the project process. What went well? What didn't? What did you learn about collaboration? What did you learn about your interests in the practice of designing, coding, and data analysis? What did you learn about personal responsibility?
❏ Deliverable A document clearly conveying your project experience, learning, and future interests.
✓- Below Standard
✓ At Standard
✓+ Above Standard
An individual reflection was submitted but presented little depth and insight into personal progress through individual contributions or team collaboration activities.
The individual reflection demonstrates a thoughtful look back at the work completed and the subsequent knowledge and aspirations that developed.
The reflection provided a clear indication of personal growth, through the collaboration process and individual effort. Also a well-formulated perspective on future intentions was portrayed.
Remember, a lot of people will likely be learning about your project for the first time. You will need to tell your story from the beginning in an engaging way.
✓- Below Standard
✓ At Standard
✓+ Above Standard
The application was functional but lacked completeness in presentation or did not meet the criteria set out in the challenge.
The application demonstrated a solutions that was thoughtfully crafted and met all the initial criteria.
The application was clearly the result of exceptional work that provided a highly engaging experience.
✓- Below Standard
✓ At Standard
✓+ Above Standard
Information presented in a way that is not always clear, concise, and logical. The presentation style and selection of material is not fully appropriate for the context.
Information presented in a clear, concise, and logical manner. The selection of material and style is appropriate and effective.
Exceptionally curated information that is delivered in an interesting, coherent and memorable way.
Delivery: Eye contact, poise, and appropriate voice-level often lacking.
Vocal clarity, eye-contact, and physical composure maintained throughout.
An exceptionally engaging delivery of content lacking unnecessary distractions from the content.